Skip to main content

Agenda and minutes

Venue: the Council Chamber - Council Offices, Trinity Road, Cirencester, GL7 1PX. View directions

Contact: Democratic Services 

Media

Items
No. Item

OS.137

Apologies

To receive any apologies for absence.

The quorum for the Overview and Scrutiny Committee is 3 members.

Additional documents:

Minutes:

Apologies were received from Councillor Tony Slater.

OS.138

Substitute Members

To note details of any substitution arrangements in place for the Meeting.

Additional documents:

Minutes:

Councillor David Fowles substituted for Councillor Tony Slater.

OS.139

Declarations of Interest

To receive any declarations of interest from Members and Officers, relating to items to be considered at the meeting.

Additional documents:

Minutes:

There were no declarations of interest.

OS.140

Minutes pdf icon PDF 555 KB

To approve the minutes of the Overview and Scrutiny Committee meeting held on 6 January 2025.

Additional documents:

Minutes:

The Chair’s amendments to the minutes of the meeting held on 6 January 2025 had been incorporated into the published version contained in the agenda pack.  The Chair invited other Members of the Committee to add their comments on the Minutes but there were none.

 

Upon being proposed and seconded, the approval of the minutes was put to the vote and agreed by the Committee.

 

RESOLVED: To APPROVE the minutes of the meeting held on 6 January 2025.

OS.141

Matters Arising from Minutes of the Previous Meeting pdf icon PDF 517 KB

To consider actions outstanding from minutes of previous meetings.

Additional documents:

Minutes:

There were no matters arising from the Minutes of the previous meeting.

OS.142

Chair's Announcements

To receive any announcements from the Chair of the Overview and Scrutiny Committee.

Additional documents:

Minutes:

The Chair stated that due to an over-run of the January meeting the reports from the two Gloucestershire Scrutiny Committees item had not been shared or discussed at that meeting so had been moved to the first part of today’s meeting.  The Chair encouraged Members and Officers to be succinct with their questions and answers, with timing warnings given by the Vice Chair if it was felt that timings could overrun.

 

The Chair noted the late supply of the Draft Budget and MTFS report and requested that reports be provided earlier so as to give more time to scrutinise in future.

 

OS.143

Public Questions

A maximum of 15 minutes is allocated for an “open forum” of public questions at committee meetings. No person may ask more than two questions (including supplementary questions) and no more than two such questions may be asked on behalf of one organisation. The maximum length of oral questions or supplementary questions by the public will be two minutes. Questions must relate to the responsibilities of the Committee but questions in this section cannot relate to applications for determination at the meeting.

 

The response may take the form of:

 

a)    A direct oral response (maximum length: 2 minutes);

b)    Where the desired information is in a publication of the Council or other published work, a reference to that publication; or

c)     Where the reply cannot conveniently be given orally, a written answer circulated later to the questioner.

Additional documents:

Minutes:

There were no public questions.

OS.144

Member Questions

A maximum period of fifteen minutes is allowed for Member questions. Questions must be directed to the Chair and must relate to the remit of the committee but may not relate to applications for determination at the meeting.

 

Questions will be asked in the order notice of them was received, except that the Chair may group together similar questions.

 

The deadline for submitting questions is 5.00pm on the working day before the day of the meeting unless the Chair agrees that the question relates to an urgent matter, in which case the deadline is 9.30am on the day of the meeting.

 

A member may submit no more than two questions. At the meeting the member may ask a supplementary question arising directly from the original question or the reply. The maximum length of a supplementary question is one minute.

 

The response to a question or supplementary question may take the form of:

 

a)    A direct oral response (maximum length: 2 minutes);

b)    Where the desired information is in a publication of the Council or other published work, a reference to that publication; or

c)     Where the reply cannot conveniently be given orally, a written answer circulated later to the questioner.

Additional documents:

Minutes:

There were no Member questions.

OS.145

Report back on recommendations pdf icon PDF 673 KB

For the Committee to note the Cabinet’s response to any recommendations arising from the previous Overview and Scrutiny Committee meeting.

Additional documents:

Minutes:

The Chair gave feedback that the Overview and Scrutiny Committee’s recommendation on the Climate and Ecological Emergency had been accepted by Cabinet.

OS.146

Updates from Gloucestershire County Council Scrutiny Committees pdf icon PDF 439 KB

Purpose

To receive any verbal updates on the work of external scrutiny bodies:

 

Gloucestershire Economic Growth Scrutiny Committee – Cllr Angus Jenkinson

Health Overview & Scrutiny Committee – Cllr Dilys Neill

 

Additional documents:

Minutes:

Councillor Jenkinson invited members for any questions on the GESSC report which had been circulated in the agenda pack.

 

No questions were asked and the Chair expressed their gratitude on the great job Councillor Jenkinson was doing on reporting from Gloucestershire County Council.  There was no report from HOSC as Cllr Neill was not present at the meeting.

 

OS.147

Work Plan and Forward Plan pdf icon PDF 503 KB

For the Committee to note and review its work plan and to select Cabinet decisions for pre-decision scrutiny at future committee meetings.

Additional documents:

Minutes:

The Chair explained that a meeting had been held informally earlier in the day to begin the process of formulating a work plan for 2025/2026.

Items for inclusion included:

  • Review of Local Plan.
  • How to deal with second homes and long-term empty properties.

 

Members felt that it would be necessary to leave time in the Work Plan to react to changing situations including the impact of devolution and the Phase 2 of the Publica  Transition. The Overview and Scrutiny Committee wanted to be able to support Cabinet ‘as and when’ and noted that the impacts of these changes will filter through as decisions and timetables are made and would come to O&S ahead of the relevant Cabinet Meeting.  The Chair was mindful of the pressures on Officers time and capacity during these substantial alterations to the Council and didn’t want to add additional items whose relevance might soon be changed.

 

Councillor Evemy, Cabinet Member for Finance and Transformation, asked that the Accountable Member for the Public Conveniences item be changed to Councillor Wilkinson, who now held the brief for this.

 

OS.148

Update on Strategic Plan for North Cotswolds pdf icon PDF 590 KB

Purpose

To update the Overview and Scrutiny Committee on emerging strategic growth proposals at Moreton-in-Marsh.

 

Recommendation

That the Overview and Scrutiny Committee notes the update on emerging strategic growth proposals at Moreton-in-Marsh and agrees any recommendations it wishes to submit to Cabinet.

Additional documents:

Minutes:

The purpose of the item was to receive an update on the strategic plan for North Cotswolds.

 

Matthew Britton, the Interim Head of Planning Policy and Infrastructure, introduced the item and explained that in January 2024, the Overview and Scrutiny Committee recommended setting up a Moreton-in-Marsh Working Group to be part of the Local Plan consultation for the Strategic Growth Proposal to consider the required infrastructure to support the additional 1,500 houses expected in the settlement. 

 

The Officer gave the following updates:

  • From the local consultations in February - April 2024 and again in October 2024 run by Planning for Real, there were asubstantial number of consultation responses which had been used to update the Local Plan policies.
  • Further identified development sites were being assessed in the Strategic Housing and Economic Land Availability update.
  • A feasibility study has been commissioned to look at the growth of Moreton-in-Marsh with a focus on the concerns highlighted from the Local Plan consultation on the capacity of the road system and the sewage infrastructure.
  • There would be a community event on 12 February to feed back on consultation, brief on the Working Group and the Town council would provide a presentation on the Railway Station redevelopment.

 

In discussing the report, Members raised the following points:

  • Concerns were raised about the slow progress with the first working group meeting happening 15 months after approval. The Interim Head of Planning Policy and Infrastructure stated that there had been Government changes to National Planning Policy. The Council had bid for £250,000 of government funding as recognition of the delays being caused. The Local Development Scheme would be presented to the 6 March 2025 Cabinet meeting providing an updated timetable for the Local Plan and associated workstreams.
  • Members wanted to know what the effect of new National Planning Policy Framework (NPPF) changes would be including the emphasis on the prioritisation of places near train stations for development. The Interim Head of Planning Policy and Infrastructure explained that it was presumed that the Planning and Infrastructure Bill in March 2025 would be favourable to development around train stations.
  • The Interim Head of Planning Policy and Infrastructure identified that the NPPF changes meant that the annual housing target has risen from 504 to 1036 homes, significantly increasing planned growth.
  • Members shared the uncertainty about the progress of the feasibility study and the Interim Head of Planning Policy and Infrastructure reported that whilst the update report was quite minimal, there were about 60 documents that were being updated e.g. Water Cycle Study, Infrastructure Delivery Plan. The consultants tasked with the Feasibility Study had split it into two parts with part 1 looking at whether a development was feasible before looking at key infrastructure to avoid unnecessary expenditure if deemed unsuitable.
  • Members asked for details around the timing and publication of the Strategic Housing and Economic Land Availability documents. The Officer reported that the Feasibility Study was being undertaken by Gloucestershire County Council and would be shared once available.
  • Members  ...  view the full minutes text for item OS.148

OS.149

Budget 2025/26 and Medium Term Financial Strategy pdf icon PDF 1 MB

Purpose

To present the Revenue Budget for 2025-26, Capital Programme and Medium-Term Financial Strategy for 2025-2026 to 2028-2029

 

Recommendation

That the Committee agrees any recommendations it wishes to submit to Cabinet on 6 February 2025.

Additional documents:

Minutes:

This report set out the Revenue Budget for 2025/26, Capital Programme and Medium-Term Financial Strategy for 2025/26 to 2028/29

 

Deputy Leader of the Council and Cabinet Member for Finance and Transformation, Councillor Mike Evemy, introduced the item. They raised the following points:

  • There was a £3m reduction in funding from Government in 2026/27.
  • The Council was not being fully reimbursed for the impact of changes to Employers National Insurance contributions in April 2025 - £267,000 shortfall.
  • The Local Government Finance Settlement (LGFS) provided district councils with a cash flat settlement only after Council Tax increases were included.
  • New Homes Bonus would continue for a further year £0.820m of one-off funding.
  • Extended Producer Responsibility – funding of £1.5m had been provided.
  • The Rural Services Delivery Grant had been abolished with a loss of £0.820m per annum.
  • There would be a £0.662m surplus in 2025/26, followed in 2026/27 by a £1.539m deficit/budget gap and in 2027/28 a £4.829m deficit/budget gap
  • The Council would be utilising its Financial Resilience Reserve and Business Rates Risk reserve to support the Medium-Term Financial Strategy.
  • The needed to be a focus on savings and cost reductions to address the budget gap in 2026/27 in order to provide services to residents.
  • The Budget included a £5 Council Tax increase, a Second Home charge, a freeze on car parking charges for stays up to one hour and inflationary rises for stays of two hours or more.
  • Garden waste fees would be increased to maintain a cost recovery position.

 

The Deputy Chief Executive added information on the risks and uncertainties around Transitional Protection estimates assuming a ‘quick’ transfer of funding along with potential global economy/trade wars.

 

Members discussed the report, raising the following points:

  • Members asked about the Capital Waste Project in light of the future of the Council and the costs involved. The Deputy Chief Executive explained that it would not be unreasonable to review the vehicle replacement programme and see how the life of the vehicles could be extended. Ideas were suggested around increasing the life of the fleet beyond the planned seven-year lifespan of the vehicles, hiring fleet vehicles, opportunities with UBICO providing services across the whole of Gloucestershire or the purchase ‘nearly new’ vehicles from other local authorities. There was a responsibility to maintain services to residents bearing in mind the impact ofdevolution changes in the future.
  • A Member asked whether circumstances created by the Devolution White Paper would allow for discretionary options with respect to the strategic use of reserves to fund off one-off costs for service improvements e.g. upgrades to critical infrastructure, visible community projects, clearing backlogs of planning enforcement cases. The view of the Chief Financial Officer was that the Section 25 statement would assess the robustness of budget estimates and adequacy of reserves, highlighting that without significant cost reductions in the next few years, continued reliance on reserves would threaten the Council’s financial sustainability and the ability to provide the quality of statutory services for residents. Unless there are significant  ...  view the full minutes text for item OS.149