Skip to main content

Agenda item

Schedule of Applications

To consider and determine the applications contained within the enclosed schedule:

 

Application No:

Description:

Ward Councillor(s):

Case Officer:

20/03198/FUL

Erection of 1 no. detached dwelling and associated works at Land Parcel Adjacent to 10

De Havilland Road, Upper Rissington

Councillor Andrew Maclean

David Ditchett

 

 

21/00751/FUL

Proposed two storey extension and single storey extension (renewal of 17/04737/FUL) at The Fennings, Back Ends, Chipping Campden,

GL55 6AU

Councillors Mark Annett and Gina Blomefield

Amy Hill

20/04249/FUL

Change of use to beauty salon to include body piercing and tattoos (sui generis) (part

retrospective) at Room 28, Moreton Area Centre, High Street, GL56 0AZ

Councillor Clive Webster

Rachel Gaskell

 

 

Minutes:

20/03198/FUL

Erection of 1no. detached dwelling and associated works at Land Parcel Adjacent to 10 De Havilland Road, Upper Rissington

The Case Officer reminded the Committee of the location of the site and then displayed a map of the site and aerial photograph, layout plan showing the designated Tree Preservation Orders on the site, block and floor plans, elevations, a Google virtual street view and photographs of the site from various vantage points.

There were no public speakers.

The Ward Member was not present as he was related to the applicant.

In response to various questions from Members it was reported the applicant had followed the correct CIL process; the proposed dwelling, if approved, would be 79 square metres at ground floor level compared to10 De Havilland Road which was 88 square metres at ground floor level; the proposals were for a three storey dwelling; replacing trees with the same number of newly-planted trees was considered acceptable mitigation, but some species were likely to be changed to be ensure more suitability for the site; there was no turning circle proposed for the site, though it was considered by Officers that one vehicle could turn within the site if necessary; the site was considered to be within a built-up area; it was not expected that the Applicant would be constructing the property themselves and Condition 8 contained a requirement for an electric vehicle charging point to be installed.

A Member commented that whilst he supported self-build properties, as they were generally more affordable, he was disappointed by the traditional nature of the build and advised that he would be abstaining from the vote.

A Proposition, that the application be approved, was duly Seconded.

Approved, as recommended.

Record of voting – for 10, against 0, abstentions 1, absent 0.

21/00751/FUL

Proposed two storey extension and single storey extension (renewal of 17/04737/FUL) at The Fennings, Back Ends, Chipping Campden, GL55 6AU

The Case Officer reminded the Committee of the location of the site and then displayed a map of the site and aerial photograph, block, floor and roof plans, elevations and photographs of the site from various vantage points.

There were no public speakers.

One Ward Member was not present at the Meeting as he was the Applicant.  The other Ward Member was also not present.

In response to various questions from Members it was reported that no response had been received from the Town Council; the application presented the same plans as the previously approved application; the conservatory was proposed to be removed as part of the proposals; the roof of a single-storey extension was also proposed to be altered; and the application was required to be considered in line with current Local Plan policies.

A Proposition, that the application be approved, was duly Seconded.

Approved, as recommended.

Record of voting – for 11, against 0, abstentions 0, absent 0.

20/04249/FUL

Change of use to beauty salon to include body piercing and tattoos (sui generis) (part retrospective) at Room 28, Moreton Area Centre, High Street, GL56 0AZ

The Case Officer reminded the Committee of the location of the site and then displayed a map of the site and internal layout plan.

In response to various questions from Members it was reported that the sui generis use did not fall into any of the specified use classes within the order and that this was usual for beauty salons; the applicant had made an enquiry to the Property Services Team of the Council and this was why the application was part retrospective; and Officers had not specified operating hours for the salon as this would be dependent upon the opening hours of the Centre.

A Proposition, that the application be approved, was duly Seconded.

Approved, as recommended.

Record of voting – for 11, against 0, abstentions 0, absent 0.

(ii)   Public Submissions

No public submissions were made at the meeting.

Supporting documents:

 

Related Pages