Agenda and minutes
PDF 540 KBVenue: the Council Chamber - Council Offices, Trinity Road, Cirencester, GL7 1PX. View directions
Contact: Democratic Services
Media
| No. | Item | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Apologies To receive any apologies for absence. The quorum for the Planning and Licensing Committee is 3 members.
Additional documents: Minutes: There were no apologies. |
|||||||||
|
Substitute Members To note details of any substitution arrangements in place for the meeting. Additional documents: Minutes: There were no substitute Members. |
|||||||||
|
Declarations of Interest To receive any declarations of interest from Members relating to items to be considered at the meeting. Additional documents: Minutes: There were declarations of interest from Councillor Nikki Ind for agenda item 10, due to previous involvement in supporting the GP surgery application. They noted that this could be perceived as bias or predetermination and they would not take part in the debate or vote. |
|||||||||
|
To confirm the minutes of the meeting of the Committee held on 13 May 2026. Additional documents: Minutes: The minutes of the meeting on 13 May 2026 were discussed. Councillor Nikki Ind proposed accepting the minutes and Councillor Julia Judd seconded the proposal which was put to the vote and agreed by the Committee.
RESOLVED: to APPROVE the minutes of the meeting held on 13 May 2026.
|
|||||||||
|
Chair's Announcements To receive any announcements from the Chair of the Planning and Licensing Committee.
Additional documents: Minutes: Thanks were given for the recent planning training, with a rolling programme of supplementary updates being developed due to ongoing changes in planning rules. Members were invited to request topics they would like included in future training sessions. Licensing training dates would be circulated to Committee members. |
|||||||||
|
Public questions A maximum of 15 minutes is allocated for an “open forum” of public questions at committee meetings. No person may ask more than two questions (including supplementary questions) and no more than two such questions may be asked on behalf of one organisation. The maximum length of oral questions or supplementary questions by the public will be one minute. Questions must relate to the responsibilities of the Committee but questions in this section cannot relate to applications for determination at the meeting.
The response may take the form of: a) A direct oral response (maximum length: 2 minutes); b) Where the desired information is in a publication of the Council or other published work, a reference to that publication; or c) Where the reply cannot conveniently be given orally, a written answer circulated later to the questioner. Additional documents: Minutes: There were no public questions. |
|||||||||
|
Member questions A maximum period of fifteen minutes is allowed for Member questions. Questions must be directed to the Chair and must relate to the remit of the Committee but may not relate to applications for determination at the meeting.
Questions will be asked in the order in which they were received but the Chair may group together similar questions.
The deadline for submitting questions is 5.00pm on the working day before the day of the meeting unless the Chair agrees that the question relates to an urgent matter, in which case the deadline is 9.30am on the day of the meeting.
A member may submit no more than two questions. At the meeting the member may ask a supplementary question arising directly from the original question or the reply. The maximum length of a supplementary question is one minute.
The response to a question or supplementary question may take the form of: a) A direct oral response (maximum length: 2 minutes); b) Where the desired information is in a publication of the Council or other published work, a reference to that publication; or c) Where the reply cannot conveniently be given orally, a written answer circulated later to the questioner. Additional documents: Minutes: Councillor Ray Brassington asked: Would the council provide an update on the enforcement situation relating to flying activities at Rendcomb airfield? The Chair answered: “The Planning Enforcement Team was continuing to investigate the reported breach of legal obligations as a high priority, with senior officers actively progressing the case to determine whether further action is expedient and proportionate. Members were reminded that enforcement investigations must be handled carefully in line with the Council’s legal duties to avoid prejudicing the investigation or limiting potential formal action.”
Further details on the Enforcement timeline was requested. |
|||||||||
|
25/02687/FUL - Land Parcel East of Willersey Business Park Proposal Residential development comprising 60 dwellings with associated roads, accesses, parking and servicing, open space, landscaping and drainage infrastructure.
Case Officer Martin Perks Ward Members Councillors Gina Blomefield & Tom Stowe
Recommendation PERMIT subject to no objection from Biodiversity Officer (and associated conditions), the completion of a S106 legal agreement covering matters such as affordable housing, self-build/custom build plots, Biodiversity Net Gain monitoring, and financial contributions to education and library services and Willersey Parish Council. Additional documents:
Minutes: The proposal was for residential development comprising 60 dwellings with associated roads, accesses, parking and servicing, open space, landscaping and drainage infrastructure.
Case Officer: Martin Perks Ward Members: Councillors Gina Blomefield and Tom Stowe Recommendation: PERMIT subject to no objection from Biodiversity Officer (and associated conditions), the completion of a S106 legal agreement covering matters such as affordable housing, self-build/custom build plots, Biodiversity Net Gain monitoring, and financial contributions to education and library services and Willersey Parish Council.
The Case Officer shared the application details with the Committee. Additional details: · Members were advised that an updated set of plans had been circulated, accurately reflecting the proposed site layout and play areas. · An update was provided following a response from Gloucestershire County Council Highways, clarifying that a new bus shelter near the recreation ground would not be justified, although contributions or improvements to bus stops on Main Street could potentially be justified.
Public Speakers Public speaker – Councillor Kevin O’Donoghue – Town and Parish Council The Parish Council did not object in principle but requested deferral for further evidence on three key issues: noise impacts from the adjacent factory, the adequacy and methodology of the £8,000 Section 106 leisure contribution, and the status of former allotment land as open space of potential public value requiring fuller assessment of need and demand before any conclusion was reached.
Public speaker – Alastair McGrigor – Objector Multiple current and proposed developments in and around Willersey could cumulatively increase pressure on already inadequate sewerage infrastructure and the Badsey Pumping Station, with concerns raised about recent sewage flooding incidents. Reference was made to the use of Grampian conditions, with confirmation that similar conditions to those applied at Folly View had been included in the current application.
Public Speaker – Councillor Gina Blomefield – Ward Member Concerns were raised regarding highway safety at the site access, limited village infrastructure, lack of local employment opportunities, and significant pressure on existing sewage and drainage systems. These issues had been addressed through proposed planning conditions, and support was expressed for strong conditions to be secured.
Public Speaker – Councillor Tom Stowe – Ward Member Concerns were raised that development in Willersey should not exacerbate infrastructure issues, particularly relating to a failing sewage and drainage network, with reports of repeated flooding and capacity problems and no clear timetable from Severn Trent for resolution. Concerns were highlighted regarding highway safety at the proposed access onto the B4632, including limited visibility, reliance on speed mitigation measures, and potential risks despite compliance with minimum standards. The importance of effective Section 106 contributions was noted, with a request that development should not proceed without robust mitigation to protect residents’ safety and quality of life.
SIB feedback. · Fast-moving traffic was reported on the adjacent road, including large industrial vehicles using the former A46 as a busy through route. · Concerns that visibility issues could make it difficult and unsafe for vehicles ... view the full minutes text for item 296.
|
|||||||||
|
25/03721/FUL - Cutlers Field And Horcott Hill Proposal Change of use of agricultural land to allow for the siting of caravans in association with Fairford Royal International Air Tattoo.
Case Officer Jordan Hawes Ward Members Councillors Helene Mansilla and Tristan Wilkinson
Recommendation PERMIT Additional documents:
Minutes: The proposal was change of use of agricultural land to allow for the siting of caravans in association with Fairford Royal International Air Tattoo.
Case Officer: Jordan Hawes Ward Members: Councillors Tristan Wilkinson and Helene Mansilla Recommendation: PERMIT
The Case Officer shared the application details with the Committee.
Public Speaker Public speaker – Emma Wellman – Applicant The Royal International Air Tattoo at RAF Fairford was a major annual event with significant economic and educational benefits. The campsites will be used to accommodate volunteers and contractors and operate on a short-term basis on agricultural land that would be fully reinstated afterwards.
Councillor Daryl Corps proposed PERMITTING the application and Councillor Julia Judd seconded the proposal. The proposal was put to the vote and agreed by the Committee.
RESOLVED: to PERMIT the application.
|
|||||||||
|
Footpath Diversion Order - Tetbury Upton Footpath Purpose To consider making a Public Path Diversion Order in respect of TETBURY UPTON Footpath No NTU 46 (Part) at Worwell Farm.
Accountable Members Councillors Nikki Ind and Laura Hall-Wilson Report Author Andrew Moody
Recommendations ThatPlanning andLicensing Committeeresolves to: a) Make a Public Path Diversion Order in respect of TETBURY UPTON Footpath No NTU 46 (Part) under Section 275 Town and Country Planning Act 1990 and carry out the statutory consultation (subject to response and any final minor amendment required by the County Council PROW Officers). b) To confirm the Public Path Diversion Order, if unopposed. Additional documents:
Minutes: The proposal was to consider making a Public Path Diversion Order in respect of TETBURY UPTON Footpath No NTU 46 (Part) at Worwell Farm.
Ward Members: Councillors Nikki Ind and Laura Hall-Wilson Report Author: Andrew Moody Recommendations: That Planningand LicensingCommittee resolvesto: a) Make a Public Path Diversion Order in respect of TETBURY UPTON Footpath No NTU 46 (Part) under Section 257 Town and Country Planning Act 1990 and carry out the statutory consultation (subject to response and any final minor amendment required by the County Council PROW Officers). b) To confirm the Public Path Diversion Order, if unopposed.
The Case Officer shared the application details with the Committee. Updates: · Additional representations did not include any objections. · Annex C supplied supporting photographic evidence.
Public Speakers Councillor Nikki Ind – Ward Member Councillor Laura Hall-Wilson – Ward Member The Ward Members expressed support for the footpath diversion order at Worwell Farm, noting that the revised route was an improvement on the previous path and that concerns raised during consultation had been addressed. It was confirmed that permissive access to the Tetbury Avon remained in place, and that the path width and usability had been reviewed on site and found to be satisfactory.
Councillor Nikki Ind left the Chamber.
Member Questions · A gate provided access to the permissive route, which remained available to users. This access was not formally part of the footpath diversion order but was retained through permissive arrangements.
Councillor Julia Judd proposed PERMITTING the application and Councillor Paul Evans seconded the proposal. The proposal was put to the vote and agreed by the Committee.
RESOLVED: to PERMIT the order.
|
|||||||||
|
Purpose This report presents the Council’s draft Local Enforcement Plan 2026–2028 for endorsement. The Plan establishes a clear and proportionate framework for investigating and responding to alleged breaches of planning control, in line with national guidance and best practice.
The Planning Committee is asked to endorse the Plan as the Council’s formal policy approach to planning enforcement for the period 2026–2028.
Accountable member Councillor Juliet Layton - Cabinet Member for Housing and Planning Report author Harrison Bowley – Head of Planning Services
Recommendation That the Planning and Licencing Committee resolves to: 1. Endorse the Local Enforcement Plan
Additional documents: Minutes: Purpose This report presents the Council’s draft Local Enforcement Plan 2026–2028 for endorsement. The Planning Committee was asked to endorse the Plan as the Council’s formal policy approach to planning enforcement for the period 2026–2028.
Accountable member: Councillor Juliet Layton - Cabinet Member for Housing and Planning Report author: Harrison Bowley – Head of Planning Services Recommendation: That the Planning and Licencing Committee resolves to: 1. Endorse the Local Enforcement Plan
Councillor Nikki Ind returned to the Chamber. The Report author shared the application details with the Committee.
Members Questions · The team was now fully staffed at 5.5 FTE. · Work was ongoing to improve reporting systems. Resources were currently being prioritised for active enforcement work, so reporting improvements would be delivered gradually. · The Section 106 monitoring officer tracked obligations as they were triggered, largely based on developer notification and periodic reporting rather than routine site inspections. · Annex A would be found in the Overview & Scrutiny Committee report.
Councillor Patrick Coleman proposed APPROVING the recommendations and Councillor Ian Watson seconded the proposal. The proposal was put to the vote and agreed by the Committee.
RESOLVED: To ENDORSE the Local Enforcement Plan
|
|||||||||
|
Appointments to Sub-Committee Purpose To invite the Licensing Committee to confirm the appointment of Sub-Committees for the 2026/27 municipal year.
Accountable member Councillor Dilys Neill
Recommendations That the Planning and Licensing Committee resolves to:
Note that Licensing Sub-Committee membership will comprise the Chair or Vice Chair of the Planning and Licensing Committee and two other members of the Planning and Licensing Committee drawn on an alphabetical rota basis from the remaining members of the Planning and Licensing Committee (subject to their availability and completion of licensing training prior to participation in a Licensing Sub Committee (Licensing Act 2003) meeting). Additional documents:
Minutes: Purpose To invite the Licensing Committee to confirm the appointment of Sub-Committees for the 2026/27 municipal year.
Accountable member:Councillor Dilys Neill Recommendations: That the Planning and Licensing Committee resolved to: 1. Appoint five members of the Committee to the Licensing Sub-Committee (Taxi, Private Hire and Street Trading) in accordance with political proportionality and the wishes of political groups (3 Liberal Democrat, 2 Conservative); 2. Note that Licensing Sub-Committee membership will comprise the Chair or Vice Chair of the Planning and Licensing Committee and two other members of the Planning and Licensing Committee drawn on an alphabetical rota basis from the remaining members of the Planning and Licensing Committee (subject to their availability and completion of licensing training prior to participation in a Licensing Sub Committee (Licensing Act 2003) meeting).
The Report Author shared the report details with the Committee.
Councillor Julia Judd proposed APPROVING the recommendations and Councillor Ray Brassington seconded the proposal. The proposal was put to the vote and agreed by the Committee.
RESOLVED: to APPROVE the recommendations.
|
|||||||||
|
Sites Inspection Briefing Members for 1 July 2026 (if required)
Councillors Dilys Neill (Chair), Ian Watson, Daryl Corps, Paul Evans, Nikki Ind. Additional documents: Minutes: Members for 1 July 2026. Councillors Dilys Neill (Chair), Ian Watson, Daryl Corps, Paul Evans, Nikki Ind. |
|||||||||
|
Licensing Sub-Committee Members for 25 June 2026
Councillors Ian Watson (Chair), Julia Judd (Vice-Chair), Michael Vann, David Fowles, Ray Brassington. Additional documents: Minutes: Members for 25 June 2026 at 2pm. Councillors Ian Watson (Chair), Julia Judd (Vice-Chair), Michael Vann, David Fowles, Ray Brassington.
|
Carried