Skip to main content

Agenda and minutes

Venue: the Council Chamber - Council Offices, Trinity Road, Cirencester, GL7 1PX. View directions

Contact: Democratic Services 

Media

Items
No. Item

165.

Apologies

To receive any apologies for absence. The quorum for the Planning and Licensing Committee is 3 members.

 

Additional documents:

Minutes:

There were apologies for absence from Councillors Ian Watson, Julia Judd, Michael Vann and Andrew Maclean.

166.

Substitute Members

To note details of any substitution arrangements in place for the meeting.

Additional documents:

Minutes:

Councillor Len Wilkins substituted for Councillor Julia Judd.

Councillor David Fowles acted as Vice-Chair.

167.

Declarations of Interest

To receive any declarations of interest from Members relating to items to be considered at the meeting.

Additional documents:

Minutes:

The Chair stated that they had consulted with the legal team as they knew several people who lived in Westcote, including one who had submitted a written objection. The Chair confirmed that they had no pecuniary interest. The Legal Advisor was satisfied that the Chair could remain.

168.

Minutes pdf icon PDF 607 KB

To confirm the minutes of the meeting of the Committee held on 9 July 2025.

 

Additional documents:

Minutes:

The minutes of the meeting held on 09 July 2025 were discussed. Councillor Ray Brassington proposed accepting the minutes and Councillor David Fowles seconded the proposal which was put to the vote and agreed by the Committee.

 

RESOLVED: To APPROVE the minutes of the meeting held on 09 July 2025.

Recorded Vote
TitleTypeRecorded Vote textResult
04. Approve minute of meeting 9 July 2025. Motion Carried
  • View Recorded Vote for this item
  • 169.

    Chair's Announcements

    To receive any announcements from the Chair of the Planning and Licensing Committee.

     

    Additional documents:

    Minutes:

    There were no Chair’s Announcements.

    170.

    Public questions

    A maximum of 15 minutes is allocated for an “open forum” of public questions at committee meetings. No person may ask more than two questions (including supplementary questions) and no more than two such questions may be asked on behalf of one organisation. The maximum length of oral questions or supplementary questions by the public will be one minute. Questions must relate to the responsibilities of the Committee but questions in this section cannot relate to applications for determination at the meeting.

     

    The response may take the form of:

    a)    A direct oral response (maximum length: 2 minutes);

    b)    Where the desired information is in a publication of the Council or other published work, a reference to that publication; or

    c)    Where the reply cannot conveniently be given orally, a written answer circulated later to the questioner.

    Additional documents:

    Minutes:

    There were no public questions.

    171.

    Member questions

    A maximum period of fifteen minutes is allowed for Member questions. Questions must be directed to the Chair and must relate to the remit of the Committee but may not relate to applications for determination at the meeting.

     

    Questions will be asked in the order in which they were received but the Chair may group together similar questions.

     

    The deadline for submitting questions is 5.00pm on the working day before the day of the meeting unless the Chair agrees that the question relates to an urgent matter, in which case the deadline is 9.30am on the day of the meeting.

     

    A member may submit no more than two questions. At the meeting the member may ask a supplementary question arising directly from the original question or the reply. The maximum length of a supplementary question is one minute.

     

    The response to a question or supplementary question may take the form of:

    a)    A direct oral response (maximum length: 2 minutes);

    b)    Where the desired information is in a publication of the Council or other published work, a reference to that publication; or

    c)    Where the reply cannot conveniently be given orally, a written answer circulated later to the questioner.

    Additional documents:

    Minutes:

    There were no member questions.

    172.

    Appointment to Sub-Committee pdf icon PDF 553 KB

    Purpose

    To invite the Licensing Committee to confirm the appointment of Sub-Committees for the 2025/26 municipal year.

     

    Recommendations

    That the Planning and Licensing Committee resolves to:

    1.    Appoint five members of the Committee to the Licensing Sub-Committee (Taxi, Private Hire and Street Trading) in accordance with political proportionality and the wishes of political groups (3 Liberal Democrat, 2 Conservative);

    2.    Note that Licensing Sub-Committee (Licensing Act 2003) membership will comprise the Chair or Vice Chair of the Planning and Licensing Committee and two other members of the Planning and Licensing Committee drawn on a rota basis from the remaining members of the Planning and Licensing Committee (subject to their availability and completion of licensing training prior to participation in a Licensing Sub Committee (Licensing Act 2003) meeting).

     

    Additional documents:

    Minutes:

    The purpose of the report was to confirm the appointments of the Licensing sub-committees for the current council year.

    In relation to taxis, private hire, and street trading sub-committee, it was proposed that five members from the committee form a subcommittee in accordance with political proportionality.

    The Licensing sub-committee (Licensing 2003 Act Matters) would be formed from a rota of Planning and Licensing Committee Members.

    Training for new Members was requested.

     

    Councillor Ray Brassington proposed appointing members to sub-committees as set out in Annex A and Annex B and Councillor David Fowles seconded the proposal.

    RESOLVED: to ACCEPT the recommendations of the appointments to the Licensing Sub-Committees as set out in Annex A and Annex B.

     

    1. Appoint Councillors Ian Watson (Chair), Julia Judd (Vice-Chair), Ray Brassington, David Fowles and Michael Vann to the Licensing Sub-Committee (Taxi, Private Hire and Street Trading);

    2.    Note that Licensing Sub-Committee (Licensing Act 2003) membership will comprise the Chair or Vice Chair of the Planning and Licensing Committee and two other members of the Planning and Licensing Committee drawn on a rota basis from the remaining members of the Planning and Licensing Committee (subject to their availability and completion of licensing training prior to participation in a Licensing Sub Committee (Licensing Act 2003) meeting), as set out in Annex B.

     


    Recorded Vote
    TitleTypeRecorded Vote textResult
    8. Approve appointments to Licensing Sub-Committees Motion Carried
  • View Recorded Vote for this item
  • 173.

    Tree Preservation Order 25/00001/IND pdf icon PDF 165 KB

    To consider comments of objection and support to the making of Tree Preservation Order 25/00001/IND Corner Cottage Church Westcote Chipping Norton Gloucestershire OX7 6SH

    Additional documents:

    Minutes:

    Proposal

    To consider comments of objection and support to the making of Tree Preservation Order 25/00001/IND Corner Cottage, Church Westcote, Chipping Norton, Gloucestershire.

    Tree Officer: James Tyson

    Ward Member: David Cunningham

     

    Original recommendation: Confirm TPO 25/00001/TPO

     

    The Chair invited the Tree Officer to introduce the Tree Preservation Order.

    The Tree Officer introduced the Tree Preservation Order (TPO) by sharing:

    • The history behind the proposal for the TPO.
    • Various site location maps and photographs of the tree from various directions.
    • A risk assessment of the tree had been made by Tree Officer and deemed low risk.

     

    Public Speaker

    Objector - David Lewis

    Objection points raised included:

    • concerns about the long term stability and the associated risk to the property and personal safety due to the close proximity of the tree to the dwelling. It was argued that the Council’s risk assessment had not accounted for the exposed location and that the tree should be considered a moderate risk, with removal being the preferred option.
    • questioning the tree’s public amenity value, citing its lean, unbalanced form, disproportionate size, and lack of aesthetic appeal, and noted that it already had protection under the conservation area designation.

     

    Members Questions

    In questioning it was noted that:

    • The tree (Corsican Pine) was approximately 25m in height and 8–10m from the property.
    • Any appeal against a decision made at the meeting would be with the Planning Inspectorate.
    • The previous tree that had been removed had not been replanted.
    • A replanting condition could not be considered if the TPO was rejected.
    • The altitude and exposure of the position had not been specifically noted in the risk assessment of the Corsican pine.
    • When permission was granted for the removal of the initial tree, the exposure of the site for the remaining tree had been taken into account.
    • The prevailing winds were South-Westerly and there would not have had any previous protection from the previously removed tree.
    • There would be no new growth from the trunk to compensate for the bare areas but other branches might grow into that space. 
    • The Corsican Pine (Black Pine) was brought to the UK in 1759 and was a common timber tree often planted as stand-alone specimens.
    • There were no figures for tree losses in the village; the only incidents known were those reported at the meeting.
    • If the TPO was confirmed, and disease was later discovered by the applicant, a further application by the applicant could apply for removal of the tree and a replant agreed.
    • The amenity assessment determined that removal of the tree would detract from the amenity and the character of the conservation area.
    • The Corsican Pine species was not particularly susceptible to falling with strong winds.
    • If the tree did fall while a TPO was in place, the Council would not be accountable as the responsibility remained with the owner. 
    • It was confirmed that causing anxiety to the applicant or neighbours was not a material planning consideration in deciding whether to confirm the TPO.

     

    Members Comments:

    Members made  ...  view the full minutes text for item 173.

    Recorded Vote
    TitleTypeRecorded Vote textResult
    9. Tree preservation Order 25/00001/IND - Refuse Motion Carried
  • View Recorded Vote for this item
  • 174.

    Sites Inspection Briefing

    Members for 3 September 2025 (if required)

     

    Councillors Dilys Neill, Ray Brassington, Daryl Corps, Julia Judd, Michael Vann.

    Additional documents:

    Minutes:

    The Chair advised members to keep the 3 September 2025 free for a possible Site Inspection Briefing.

    Councillors Dilys Neill, Ray Brassington, Daryl Corps, Julia Judd, Michael Vann.

     

    175.

    Licensing Sub-Committee

    Members for 21 August (if required)

     

    Councillors Dilys Neill, David Fowles, Ray Brassington.

    Additional documents:

    Minutes:

    There were no licensing sub-committees planned.