Skip to main content

Agenda and minutes

Venue: the Council Chamber - Council Offices, Trinity Road, Cirencester, GL7 1PX. View directions

Contact: Democratic Services 

Media

Items
No. Item

125.

Apologies

To receive any apologies for absence. The quorum for the Planning and Licensing Committee is 3 members.

 

Additional documents:

Minutes:

 

 Apologies were received from Councillor Michael Vann.

126.

Substitute Members

To note details of any substitution arrangements in place for the meeting.

Additional documents:

Minutes:

 

 There were no substitute Members.

127.

Declarations of Interest

To receive any declarations of interest from Members relating to items to be considered at the meeting.

Additional documents:

Minutes:

Members acknowledged that Councillor Jeremy Theyer was known to members of the committee as a Cotswold District Councillor.

Councillor Coleman declared that he had known the source of the public comment for Agenda item 10 – 24/00981/FUL

128.

Minutes pdf icon PDF 568 KB

To confirm the minutes of the meeting of the Committee held on 9 April 2025

Additional documents:

Minutes:

The minutes of the meeting held on 9 April 2025 were discussed.

Councillor Daryl Corps proposed accepting the minutes and Councillor Patrick Coleman seconded the proposal which was put to the vote and agreed by the Committee.

 

RESOLVED: To APPROVE the minutes of the meeting held on 9 April 2025.

Recorded Vote
TitleTypeRecorded Vote textResult
Minutes Resolution Carried
  • View Recorded Vote for this item
  • 129.

    Chair's Announcements

    To receive any announcements from the Chair of the Planning and Licensing Committee.

     

    Additional documents:

    Minutes:

    The Chair announced that he would be stepping down from the role, noting that this meeting would be his final one as Chair.

    The Chair expressed gratitude to those who had supported the work of the committee. Thanks were extended to the staff from Democratic Services for their efforts in organising meetings and ensuring they ran smoothly. Appreciation was given to the Legal Services team, with particular thanks to Helen Blundell for her assistance and reassuring presence, as well as her legal guidance throughout.

     

    The Chair extended his thanks to the planning officers, acknowledged their professionalism, dedication, and extensive knowledge, which had greatly supported the Chair in his role.

    The Chair expressed appreciation for the support staff within the planning department, recognising the significant work they do behind the scenes to prepare for meetings, and noted that their contributions were essential to the functioning of the committee.

    Thanks were given to all Committee Members for their support and patience during the Chair's tenure.

     

    A special note of thanks was given to Councillor Julia Judd, who had served as Vice-Chair during the Chair’s first year.

    The Chair offered appreciation to Councillor Patrick Coleman, the current Vice-Chair, for his support and assistance over the past three years and his consistent backing and contribution.

     

     

    The Interim Head of Legal Services thanked the Committee for their professional conduct in her final Committee meeting and expressed her pleasure in supporting Planning and Licensing Committee meetings.

     

    Thanks were echoed to the Chair and Interim Head of Legal Services and Vice Chair from Members of the Committee.

    130.

    Public questions

    A maximum of 15 minutes is allocated for an “open forum” of public questions at committee meetings. No person may ask more than two questions (including supplementary questions) and no more than two such questions may be asked on behalf of one organisation. The maximum length of oral questions or supplementary questions by the public will be one minute. Questions must relate to the responsibilities of the Committee but questions in this section cannot relate to applications for determination at the meeting.

     

    The response may take the form of:

    a)    A direct oral response (maximum length: 2 minutes);

    b)    Where the desired information is in a publication of the Council or other published work, a reference to that publication; or

    c)    Where the reply cannot conveniently be given orally, a written answer circulated later to the questioner.

    Additional documents:

    Minutes:

    There were no public questions.

     

    131.

    Member questions

    A maximum period of fifteen minutes is allowed for Member questions. Questions must be directed to the Chair and must relate to the remit of the Committee but may not relate to applications for determination at the meeting.

     

    Questions will be asked in the order in which they were received but the Chair may group together similar questions.

     

    The deadline for submitting questions is 5.00pm on the working day before the day of the meeting unless the Chair agrees that the question relates to an urgent matter, in which case the deadline is 9.30am on the day of the meeting.

     

    A member may submit no more than two questions. At the meeting the member may ask a supplementary question arising directly from the original question or the reply. The maximum length of a supplementary question is one minute.

     

    The response to a question or supplementary question may take the form of:

    a)    A direct oral response (maximum length: 2 minutes);

    b)    Where the desired information is in a publication of the Council or other published work, a reference to that publication; or

    c)    Where the reply cannot conveniently be given orally, a written answer circulated later to the questioner.

    Additional documents:

    Minutes:

    There were no member questions.

     

    132.

    21/01892/FUL - Outbuilding to the East of Poplars Barn, Moreton-in-Marsh. pdf icon PDF 113 KB

    Proposal

    Demolition of existing outbuilding and erection of new dwelling

     

    Case Officer

    Charlotte Van De Wydeven

     

    Ward Member

    Councillor David Cunningham

     

    Recommendation

    PERMIT

    Additional documents:

    Minutes:

    Proposal

    The proposal was for the demolition of an existing outbuilding and the erection of new dwelling in the village of Evenlode.

    Case Officer: Charlotte Van De Wydeven

    Ward Member: Councillor David Cunningham

     

    Due to the Case Officer being unavailable, the Head of Planning Services proposed that the planning application be deferred to a later meeting.

     

     

    Recommendation

    The recommendation was changed to DEFER consideration of the case of planning application 21/01892/FUL due to the Case Officer being absent.

     

    Proposed by Councillor Judd and seconded by Councillor Harris

     

    The recommendation to defer was APPROVED.

     

    Recorded Vote
    TitleTypeRecorded Vote textResult
    21/01892/FUL - outbuilding to the East of Poplars Barn, Moreton-In-Marsh. To Defer decision Resolution Carried
  • View Recorded Vote for this item
  • 133.

    25/00505/FUL - Land off Kingshill Lane to Witpit Lane, Cirencester pdf icon PDF 118 KB

    Proposal

    Change of use of the site to a mixture of agriculture and equestrian.

     

    Case Officer

    Helen Cooper

     

    Ward Member

    Councillor Mike Evemy

     

    Recommendation

    PERMIT

    Additional documents:

    Minutes:

    Proposal

    The proposal was for the Change of use of the site to a mixture of agriculture and equestrian (Retrospective) at Land off Kingshill Lane to Witpit Lane, Preston, Cirencester.

     

    Case Officer: Helen Cooper

    Ward Member: Councillor Mike Evemy

     

    Original recommendation: PERMIT.

     

    The Chair invited the Case Officer to introduce the application.

    • There were no additional pages or updates provided.
    • Various location maps and site photographs were shared

     

    Members questions:

    Members asked questions of the Case Officer, who responded as follows:

     

    • It was confirmed that the site would have a mixed use, with areas designated for both equestrian and agricultural purposes. Some parts of the field were expected to be used for hay production, while others would be used for grazing horses.  It was intended for rotation of grazing within the site.
    • A representation was noted from a resident, who had raised concerns about odour from manure during warmer weather, attributed to the existing field shelter. A question was raised as to whether a condition could be applied to ensure that any field shelter or manure storage was kept a minimum distance from residential properties.
    • The Case Officer clarified that the existing field shelter was not part of the current application, as the applicant considered it to be a temporary, moveable structure and not classified as development requiring planning permission. If such a structure were to be located in a certain position for a significant period of time, the local planning authority might consider it to be operational development and planning permission would then be required.
    • Regarding manure storage, officers confirmed that the applicant intended to manage waste by rotating grazing areas and harrowing manure into the ground, with no manure heaps or trailers proposed. An informative had been included in the recommendation to advise the applicant to take care in the siting of manure and any other waste arising from the equestrian use so as not to cause a justifiable complaint or statutory nuisance.
    • A question was raised regarding Condition 4 - external lighting, asking whether there was an application or intention to install lighting on the site.  The Officer responded that, to their knowledge, no external lighting was proposed at that time. The condition was included to ensure control should any lighting be proposed in the future. It was also noted that the field shelter had no electrical services connected, so any lighting installation would require a separate application.

     

    A proposal to permit the application in line with the officer recommendations was proposed by Councillor Maclean and seconded by Councillor Judd.  This proposal was put to the vote and agreed by the Committee.

     

    Recorded Vote
    TitleTypeRecorded Vote textResult
    25/00505/FUL - Land off Kingshill Lane to Witpit Lane, Cirencester. To Permit Resolution Carried
  • View Recorded Vote for this item
  • 134.

    24/00981/FUL - The Barn, Hills Farm, Chedworth pdf icon PDF 92 KB

    Proposal

    Construction of an agricultural building

     

    Case Officer

    Graham Smith

     

    Ward Member

    Councillor Paul Hodgkinson

     

    Recommendation

    PERMIT

    Additional documents:

    Minutes:

    Proposal:

    The proposal was for the construction of an agricultural building at The Barn, Hills Farm, Chedworth.

     

    Case Officer: Graham Smith

    Ward Member: Councillor Paul Hodgkinson

    Original Recommendation: PERMIT

     

    The Chair invited the Case Officer, who introduced the applications.

    • There were additional pages circulated as supplementary documents which included an updated Case Officer Report and a public objection comment.
    • The Case Officer shared site location plans, various maps, plans and photographs of the application site.

    Questions.

    • A member asked if the application was approved, could that set a precedent for a future applications to seek a residential conversion.  In response, the Head of Planning Services confirmed that each application would be considered on a case-by-case basis and assessed against the planning policies in force at that time.
    • A member expressed concern about the substantial scale and construction of the building, particularly given its concrete base, and questioned whether its size was justified. The Officer stated that the proposal was considered proportionate and appropriate for the agricultural need
    • A concern was raised about the removal of vegetation.  The Case Officer confirmed that some of the vegetation was under the applicant's control. However, as the site was situated within a conservation area, any removal of trees would require permission from the local planning authority.
    • A Member raised a question regarding any restrictions on what the building could be used for in the future. It was explained that different recommendations for agricultural buildings were outlined in the Case Officer’s report.
    • Questions were raised about light pollution concerns.  The Case Officer explained that there were no windows in the proposed building and conditions had been added limiting external lighting.

     

    A proposal to permit the application in line with the officer recommendations was proposed by Councillor Mark Harris and seconded by Councillor Julia Judd.  This proposal was put to the vote and agreed by the Committee.

    Recorded Vote
    TitleTypeRecorded Vote textResult
    24/00981/FUL - The Barn, Hills Farm, Chedworth. To Permit. Resolution Carried
  • View Recorded Vote for this item
  • 135.

    Sites Inspection Briefing

    Members for 4 June 2025 (if required)

     

    Councillors Ray Brassington, Daryl Corps, Mark Harris, Dilys Neill, Michael Vann

    Additional documents:

    Minutes:

    The Chair advised members to keep the date of 4 June 2025 free in their diaries.

    136.

    Licensing Sub-Committee

    Members for 29 May 2025 (if required)

     

    To be confirmed.

    Additional documents:

    Minutes:

    There were no licensing sub-committees planned.