Skip to main content

Agenda and draft minutes

Venue: the Council Chamber - Council Offices, Trinity Road, Cirencester, GL7 1PX. View directions

Contact: Democratic Services 

Media

Items
No. Item

103.

Apologies

To receive any apologies for absence. The quorum for the Planning and Licensing Committee is 3 members.

 

Additional documents:

Minutes:

Apologies were received from Councillor Ian Watson and Councillor Michael Vann.

 

104.

Substitute Members

To note details of any substitution arrangements in place for the meeting.

Additional documents:

Minutes:

There were no substitute members.

105.

Declarations of Interest

To receive any declarations of interest from Members relating to items to be considered at the meeting.

Additional documents:

Minutes:

8. 24/01608/FUL - Land West of Down Ampney Football Club.

David Fowles, Personal, Councillor Fowles was the Ward Member for Down Ampney 2003 - 2019.

 

9. 24/02125/FUL - The Barn Hills Farm.

Julia Judd, Personal, The applicant is known as a fellow Cotwold District Councillor.

 

106.

Minutes pdf icon PDF 542 KB

To confirm the minutes of the meeting of the Committee held on 12 February 2025.

Additional documents:

Minutes:

The Minutes of the meeting held on 12 February 2025 were considered.

The acceptance of the minutes subject to a minor spelling adjustment was proposed by Councillor Mark Harris and seconded by Councillor Andrew Maclean. 

This proposal was put to the vote and agreed by the Committee.

 

Recorded Vote
TitleTypeRecorded Vote textResult
03. To confirm the minutes of the meeting of the Committee held on 12 February 2025. Resolution Carried
  • View Recorded Vote for this item
  • 107.

    Chair's Announcements

    To receive any announcements from the Chair of the Planning and Licensing Committee.

     

    Additional documents:

    Minutes:

    The Chair informed the Committee that the National Planning Policy Framework (NPPF) feedback would be updated very shortly.

     

    The Chair, on behalf of the Committee, thanked Adrian Harding, Interim Assistant Director of Planning, and Richard McEllistrum, Interim Development Management Manager, as they concluded their roles within Cotswold District Council.

    108.

    Public questions

    A maximum of 15 minutes is allocated for an “open forum” of public questions at committee meetings. No person may ask more than two questions (including supplementary questions) and no more than two such questions may be asked on behalf of one organisation. The maximum length of oral questions or supplementary questions by the public will be two minutes. Questions must relate to the responsibilities of the Committee but questions in this section cannot relate to applications for determination at the meeting.

     

    The response may take the form of:

    a)    A direct oral response (maximum length: 2 minutes);

    b)    Where the desired information is in a publication of the Council or other published work, a reference to that publication; or

    c)    Where the reply cannot conveniently be given orally, a written answer circulated later to the questioner.

    Additional documents:

    Minutes:

    There were no public questions.

    109.

    Member questions

    A maximum period of fifteen minutes is allowed for Member questions. Questions must be directed to the Chair and must relate to the remit of the committee but may not relate to applications for determination at the meeting.

     

    Questions will be asked in the order notice of them was received, except that the Chair may group together similar questions.

     

    The deadline for submitting questions is 5.00pm on the working day before the day of the meeting unless the Chair agrees that the question relates to an urgent matter, in which case the deadline is 9.30am on the day of the meeting.

     

    A member may submit no more than two questions. At the meeting the member may ask a supplementary question arising directly from the original question or the reply. The maximum length of a supplementary question is one minute.

     

    The response to a question or supplementary question may take the form of:

    a)    A direct oral response (maximum length: 2 minutes);

    b)    Where the desired information is in a publication of the Council or other published work, a reference to that publication; or

    c)    Where the reply cannot conveniently be given orally, a written answer circulated later to the questioner.

    Additional documents:

    Minutes:

    There were no member questions

    110.

    24/01608/FUL - Land West of Down Ampney Football Club pdf icon PDF 230 KB

    Proposal

    Erection of 13no. affordable homes with associated works at Land West of Down Ampney Football Club Broadleaze Down Ampney Gloucestershire.

     

    Case Officer

    Martin Perks

     

    Ward Member

    Councillor Lisa Spivey

     

    Recommendation

    PERMIT Subject to no objection from Gloucestershire County Council Lead Local Flood Authority and completion of S106 legal agreement covering provision of affordable housing and financial contributions towards school transport and North Meadow and Clattinger Farm Special Area of Conservation.

     

     

    Additional documents:

    Minutes:

    The application was for the erection of thirteen affordable homes with associated work at Land West of Down Ampney Football Club.

     

    Case Officer: Martin Perks

    Ward Member: Councillor Lisa Spivey

     

    Original Recommendation:

    PERMIT Subject to no objection from Gloucestershire County Council Lead Local Flood Authority and completion of S106 legal agreement covering provision of affordable housing and financial contributions towards school transport and North Meadow and Clattinger Farm Special Area of Conservation.

     

    The Chair invited the Case Officer to introduce the application:

    • There were additional pages as supplementary documents to include a Cabinet Report dated 22 November 2022
    • Various maps and photographs of site location, housing layout scenescape.

     

    Public speakers:

     

    Public Speaker 1.

    The Parish Council Member, Councillor Richard Busby made the following points:

    • He was not against social housing but opposed this plan as it disregarded the Down Ampney Neighbourhood Development Plan (2024).
    • The proposed density exceeded village norms; fewer dwellings would align better with local policies.
    • The plans contradicted parking local regulations and created safety risks due to off-plot parking arrangements.
    • The area already suffered from flooding; the drainage strategy in the application was unclear and inadequate.
    • Residents felt that the local sewage system was overloaded and that the application provided no timeline for essential upgrades.
    • Concerns were raised about a potential conflict of interest regarding Cotswold District Council's involvement in the application.

     

    Public Speaker 2.

    Mr Geoffrey Tappern spoke to object to the application:

    • Objections were made to the overruling of the Down Ampney Neighbourhood plan and a possible conflict of interest related to the development of land owned by the Council.
    • Concerns about a lack of housing mix as all units were affordable housing and the proposed density exceeding the village standard of 12.5 dwellings per hectare.
    • Concerns were also raised about the Ampney St. Peter sewage plant being able to support additional housing with no confirmed upgrade to date.

     

    Public speakers 3.

    Robert Weaver, Chief Executive stood in for Alan Hope, the Strategic Housing Manager.  The following points were raised:

    • The Council has partnered with Bromford, a major UK housing association, to develop genuinely affordable housing. 
    • Bromford would own and manage the homes, aiming to support thriving communities.
    • This project would build on a 2022 collaboration agreement between Bromford and Cotswold District Council for sustainable affordable housing.
    • The development included 13 social rented homes, a play area, open space, and a financial contribution for school transport.

     

    Chris Moore, (Agent)

    • The development aimed to address two urgent issues in the Cotswolds: affordable housing shortages and the impact of climate change. 
    • The development provided 100% affordable, social rented housing with a mix of two and three-bedroom homes.
    • The Cotswolds had a significant gap between average income and house prices, and the development helped to address this issue with a new type of affordable housing for the local area.
    • The design focused on sustainability, using a fabric-first approach and renewable energy sources to reduce energy bills and lower running costs.
    • The applicant addressed concerns about foul and  ...  view the full minutes text for item 110.
    Recorded Vote
    TitleTypeRecorded Vote textResult
    24/01608/FUL - Land West of Down Ampney Football Club. To Permit subject to Construction Management Plans. Resolution Carried
  • View Recorded Vote for this item
  • 111.

    24/02125/FUL - The Barn Hills Farm pdf icon PDF 87 KB

    Proposal

    The proposal is for the erection of first storey extension and ground floor alterations.

     

    Case Officer

    Graham Smith

     

    Ward Member

    Councillor Paul Hodgkinson

     

    Recommendation

    Refuse

    Additional documents:

    Minutes:

    The application was for the erection of a first storey extension and ground floor alterations.

     

    Case Officer: Graham Smith

    Ward Member: Cllr Paul Hodgkinson

     

    Original recommendation: Refuse

     

    The Chair invited the Case Officer to introduce the application:

    • There was a minor amendment proposed to the ground floor to replace a window with the door.
    • The Case Officer shared site location, floor plans and elevations and photographs of building. 

     

    Public speakers:

    Speaker 1

    Chedworth and Withington Parish Council – Councillor David Broad

    The Parish council had no objections to the extension application subject to no unnecessary external lighting and found nothing to object to regarding the design.

     

    Speaker 2

    Supporter – Helen Bridge

    Helen Bridge described the need for the extension for extra room and they gave very careful consideration to the character of the barn and the impact on the conservation area.

     

    Speaker 3

    Applicant – Councillor Jeremy Theyer

    Councillor Jeremy Theyer explained how they had kept their design in keeping with the hay barn design.

     

    Members questions:

    Members asked questions of the Case Officer, who responded as follows:

    • There was no pre-application submitted prior to the planning application.
    • Although the Conservation Officer had not visited the site prior to producing the consultee comment, they had visited with previous building applications for the dwelling.
    • The distance between the application dwelling and neighbouring properties was a reasonable distance and officers did not have concerns about being overlooked.
    • The twin gable design was deemed uncharacteristic of the agricultural setting as confirmed by the Conservation Officer.
    • The Head of Planning described the Local Plan Policies EN2, AN12 and EN13 that related to the decision to refuse the application but noted that all policies referred to within the refusal reason were relevant.

     

    Member Comments:

    Members made the following comments:

    • Members felt that it would be unfair to bypass the usual planning process due to the applicant being a Cotswold District Councillor.
    • Some members felt that the lack of visual pictures of the gable end made it difficult to appreciate the potentially disproportionate addition to the existing building.
    • Members commented that, although not a listed building, barns were a non-designated heritage asset.

     

    Councillor Mark Harris proposed refusing the application.

    The proposal was seconded by Councillor David Fowles and was put to the vote and was agreed by the Committee.

     

    Resolved: To REFUSE the application.

    Recorded Vote
    TitleTypeRecorded Vote textResult
    24/02125/FUL - The Barns Hills Farm. Proposal to Refuse. Resolution Carried
  • View Recorded Vote for this item
  • 112.

    Sites Inspection Briefing

    Members for 2 April 2025 (if required)

     

    Councillors Ray Brassington, Mark Harris, Andrew Maclean, Dilys Neill, Gary Selwyn.

    Additional documents:

    Minutes:

    The Chair advised members that there would be a Site Inspection Briefing on 2 April 2025 with Councillor Ray Brassington, Councillor Mark Harris, Councillor Andrew Maclean, Councillor Dilys Neill and Councillor Gary Selwyn.

     

    113.

    Licensing Sub-Committee

    Members for 27 March 2025 (if required)

     

    To be confirmed.

    Additional documents:

    Minutes:

    There were no licensing sub-committees planned.