Skip to main content

Agenda and minutes

Contact: Democratic Services 

Media

Items
No. Item

70.

Apologies

Additional documents:

Minutes:

Apologies for absence were received from Councillors Ray Brassington, Richard Keeling, Andrew Maclean, Dilys Neill and Clive Webster.

 

Councillor Richard Morgan would be late attending the meeting.

 

Councillor Ind noted that Councillors Neil and Webster were absent due to Covid-19 and wished them both well in their recovery.

71.

Declarations of Interest

To receive any declarations of interest from Members and Officers, relating to

items to be considered at the meeting.

Additional documents:

Minutes:

There were no declarations of interest.

72.

Minutes pdf icon PDF 102 KB

To confirm the minutes of the meeting of Council held on 16 February 2022.

Additional documents:

Minutes:

The minutes of the meeting held on 16 February 2022 were agreed as a correct record and signed by the Chairman, subject to the following:

 

Cllr Berry stated that he had informed the Leader, prior to the meeting, that the Conservative Group didn't support this motion and in view of this asked that the motion be removed since it would be a purely Liberal Democrat motion not a full Council one.  This having been refused, Cllr. Berry stated that the Conservatives would therefore write separately to the Boundaries Commission and separately attend the review.

 

Councillor Judd felt that the response given to Mr Rob Gibson’s public question should be expanded on because it was a question of standards and was how the Council was perceived.

 

Councillor Cunningham referred to the minute relating to precepts for Town and Parish Councils and felt that the comments made by the Deputy Chief Executive be recorded.

 

Councillor Andrews stated that he agreed with Councillor Judd’s comments and felt that the minutes should be a true record of the meeting.  In response, the Monitoring Officer reminded Members that the minutes were not a verbatim record and suggested that they be amended to make reference to the webcast, should individuals wish to view the full debate.

 

RESOLVED: That the minutes be approved, subject to the inclusion of the  amendments detailed above.

 

Voting Record – For: 28, against: 0, Abstention: 0, Absent: 6.

 

73.

Announcements from the Chair, Leader or Chief Executive (if any)

Additional documents:

Minutes:

The Vice Chair, Councillor Ind welcomed everyone to the meeting and reminded them that it was being recorded and live streamed.

 

Councillor Ind introduced the officers present and took the opportunity to record her thanks to Ben Patel-Sadler, Democratic Services Manager for his work over the past year as he was leaving the employment of Publica shortly.

 

Armed Forces Covenant

Councillor Forde provided Members with an update and reminded Members of the Motion relating to the re-signing of the Armed Forces Covenant which she herself had been proud to sign this week.

 

Reflection on Local and International Events

Councillor Ind asked Members to remember local residents Clive and Valerie Warrington and stated that the Council’s thoughts were with their family and friends following recent tragic events.  Whilst shocking, Councillor Ind reminded the meeting that despite this incident, the Cotswolds was still one of the safest areas in the country.

 

Internationally, Councillor Ind reflected on the difficulties facing the people of Ukraine who were struggling to maintain their democracy, something that could easily be taken for granted.  She welcomed visitors to the meeting, representing Ukraine, in particular Lascavo Prosevo.

 

Response to Ukraine Crisis

The Leader, Councillor Harris addressed the meeting and advised that the thoughts, prayers and solidarity of the Council were with the people of Ukraine.  He reflected on the crisis, the community response and the support being given to Ukranian residents in the District.  He also expressed his support to those residents of Russian heritage and all those individuals directly affected. Councillor Harris specifically welcomed three members of the public, Steve, Kristina and Kate who had all been impacted by the war and he outlined the individual struggles they were facing.  In welcoming them, he expressed the Council’s support and solidarity for them.

 

Councillor Harris outlined the steps the Council were taking to respond to the refugee crisis including cyber security, the resettlement scheme and the domestic consequences.  He announced the creation of a ‘Ukranians in Cotswolds Community Support Group’ which would help refugees link up with each other, integrate with the community and access employment and benefits.  The meeting noted that Councillor Forde would be adding ‘Refugee Support’ to her Cabinet portfolio and Councillor Spivey would be instructing officer to write to landlords of empty properties, to ask them to bring them forward for the housing of refugees.

 

In addition, a dedicated email address would be set up allowing residents direct access to the officers dealing in this area of work.  Councillor Harris expressed his gratitude to the Council’s Refugee Co-ordinator, Paula Massey, who had been working tirelessly on this issue.  With regard to cyber security, the ICT team were praised for their work on ensuring robust systems were in place to mitigate against attack and to minimise any disruption.  Councillor Harris referred to the work being done within Publica and with shareholders to restrict Russian and Belarusian companies financially.  He assured the meeting that residents would continue to be supported during the cost of living crisis, with  ...  view the full minutes text for item 73.

74.

Public Questions

To deal with questions from the public within the open forum question and answer session of fifteen minutes in total. Questions from each member of the public should be no longer than two minutes each and relate to issues under the Council’s or Committee’s remit. Any member of the public wishing to ask a public question is requested to contact Democratic Services by no later than 5.00pm the working day before the meeting.

Additional documents:

Minutes:

Question from Mr Fowles to Councillor Mike Evemy

 

Mr Fowles referred to the question he had asked Councillor Evemy in December relating to poor staff morale.  He had asked for the number of employees that had left since the Liberal Democrats came to power in the District, the number of new posts created and the total cost to Council Tax payers.  Mr Fowles thanked Jan Britton for his comprehensive reply and felt that the facts spoke for themselves.  He advised that since 2019, 82 people had left the Council which equated to 37% of the total workforce.  Mr Fowles stated that these changes had cost £550k, with the additional strengthening of the Senior Management Team costing a further £330k.  He asked Councillor Evemy if he could comment on the fact that one third of staff had left with a resultant cost of just short of a million pounds.  He queried if the administration had lost the respect and support of the staff.

The Deputy Leader Councillor Evemy stated that people leave for a number of reasons although there was recognition that the planning private sector was particularly attractive to Councils’ planning officers who were in short supply across the country.  Councillor Evemy did not accept there was an issue with morale and stated that without a suitable comparator, 82 leavers could not be described as high and added that the new appointments had been made to support manifesto priorities and commitments, particularly those affecting climate change.

 

Mr Fowles second question referred to the requirement for the Council to develop a meaningful Parking Strategy for the area, and specifically Cirencester.  Mr Fowles stated that their did not appear to be a strategy in place and a number of parking initiatives (e.g. cashless payment machines, free after 3)  had been stopped and parking income had reduced by £400k.  Mr Fowles also asked if detailed parking details and income (by car park) details could be made available.

Councillor Evemy replied that the detailed figures would be made available on the Council’s website, but the recent pandemic had drastically effected people’s lives and work and this had an effect on carpark usage.  Councillor Evemy also stated that it was too soon to see how carpark usage would change in the longer term and large scale initiatives, such as the development of a multi-story car park, had been put on hold until this becomes clear.  In the meantime changes had been made to the pricing of season-tickets including the Rugby club car-park to make it more attractive.

 

Question from Bella Heathcote

 

A question was submitted by Bella Heathcote referring to the Bid Process and the cost of surveys being conducted in the centre of town and at Love Lane.  With the increased costs being faced by businesses, are these costs and the associated cost of consultants justified?

Councillor Dale responded that he will refer the question to officers for a written response of the specific costs.  In the wider context there have been around 300  ...  view the full minutes text for item 74.

75.

Member Questions

The following questions have been submitted:

 

Question from Councillor Nick Maunder to Councillor Mike Evemy, Deputy Leader of the Council and Cabinet Member for Finance:

 

Twelve months ago, the Council started levying an additional 50p on parking stays at the Rissington Road car park in Bourton-on-the-Water to generate revenue to spend in the village on managing the impacts of tourism.

 

Could the Deputy Leader and Cabinet Member for Finance please advise the Council:

(i) the revenue generated so far by the charge;

(ii) what this revenue has been spent on in 2021/22; and

(iii) the budget and plans for spending the revenue from the charge in 2022/23.

 

 

Question from Councillor Claire Bloomer to Councillor Joe Harris, Leader of the Council:

 

Cirencester Town Council has recently taken steps to implement a menopause policy for the Council staff. What plans does Cotswold District Council have to do the same?

 

 

Question from Councillor Stephen Andrews to Councillor Joe Harris, Leader of the Council:

 

Over the past two years I have asked a number of questions relating to the response of this Council to Consultations that the Government or other bodies have conducted. Given his responsibility for Democratic Renewal and Consultation, will he endorse the suggestion that I have made to Officers that all such responses are made available to the Public on the website of this Council as soon as they have been completed?

 

 

Question from Councillor Stephen Andrews to Councillor Lisa Spivey, Cabinet Member for Housing and Homelessness:

 

In late 2017 the idea of a scheme for the regeneration of poor standard Social Rent housing in Kempsford was first conceived. Following consultation, including with the residents of that housing, this scheme was agreed and planning permission sought in 2019. At the same time, residents were encouraged by the Housing Association to move out and into other properties in nearby settlements such as Fairford. Since then, the Oakley flats have been demolished and most of the houses boarded up. Despite requests from the Parish Council and myself the Housing Association have failed to indicate when this regeneration programme will be completed.

The result, is a net loss to this Council of in excess of 20 social rent houses; the disruption of the lives of its occupants; and, a complete change to the fabric of the village of Kempsford and its vibrancy.

Will she agree that this is wholly unacceptable given the priority she has claimed this administration affords to increasing social rented housing in particular?

 

 

Question from Councillor Julia Judd to Councillor Joe Harris, Leader of the Council:

 

In July last year the Government launched the £4.8 billion Levelling Up Fund aimed at investment in infrastructure across the UK that improves everyday life, including the regeneration of town centres and high streets, upgrading local transport and investing in cultural, heritage, leisure and business assets. The LGA welcomed the announcement and applauded the fact that councils were placed at the heart of the delivery of the Fund.

 

Did CDC jump  ...  view the full agenda text for item 75.

Additional documents:

Minutes:

The following questions, and subsequent responses had been received by Members in line with the Council Procedure Rules:

Question from Councillor Nick Maunder to Councillor Mike Evemy, Deputy Leader of the Council and Cabinet Member for Finance:

 

Twelve months ago, the Council started levying an additional 50p on parking stays at the Rissington Road car park in Bourton-on-the-Water to generate revenue to spend in the village on managing the impacts of tourism.  Could the Deputy Leader and Cabinet Member for Finance please advise the Council of the revenue generated so far by the charge, what this revenue has been spent on in 2021/22; and the budget and plans for spending the revenue from the charge in 2022/23.”

 

Response from Councillor Mike Evemy, Deputy Leader of the Council and Cabinet Member for Finance:

 

The Bourton car park levy has generated £54,710 to spend in the village up to 28 February 2022.  The Council has used these funds to employ a village warden for Bourton-on-the-Water at a cost of £23,000 per annum. It has also been spent on additional waste bins in the village (£3,000) and used to support the cost of installing bollards on Rissington Road opposite the car park (£7,500). We’ve also used £1,200 from the fund to pay for an accessibility audit for the village.  The village warden position is being retained in 2022/23 together with collections from the additional waste bins. A full review will be carried out following the end of the financial year that will include consulting on new plans with the Parish Council, businesses and residents. The surplus from 2021/22 will be rolled forward into 2022/23 and included as part of the review and consultation.

 

Supplementary Question from Councillor Nick Maunder to Councillor Mike Evemy, Deputy Leader of the Council and Cabinet Member for Finance:

 

Will follow up consultation include direct community engagement?

 

Response from Councillor Mike Evemy, Deputy Leader of the Council and Cabinet Member for Finance:

 

Yes the follow up consultation will include community engagement and this will take place in  the next 4-6 weeks.

 

Question from Councillor Claire Bloomer to Councillor Joe Harris, Leader of the Council:

Cirencester Town Council has recently taken steps to implement a menopause policy for the Council staff. What plans does Cotswold District Council have to do the same?

 

Response from Councillor Joe Harris, Leader of the Council:

The Council is committed to providing an inclusive and supportive working environment for everyone who works here and has recently drafted a ‘Menopause and the workplace’ policy, which will be formally adopted shortly. To support the new policy online training and information has already been provided to all staff / Managers and an awareness raising article was published on our internal portal.

 

Question from Councillor Stephen Andrews to Councillor Joe Harris, Leader of the Council:

 

Over the past two years I have asked a number of questions relating to the response of this Council to Consultations that the Government or other bodies have conducted.  ...  view the full minutes text for item 75.

76.

Changes to Cotswold District Council's Offices at Trinity Road, Cirencester to Facilitate Agile Working and Increase Commercial Income pdf icon PDF 278 KB

Purpose

To seek agreement to the changes to Cotswold District Council’s Offices at Trinity Road, Cirencester to facilitate implementation of the Agile Working Strategy, reducing costs and carbon impact of the Council’s operations and creating lettable space within the building to provide income to the Council.

 

Recommendation(s)

That Council agrees:

 

a) to support the proposed changes to office layout;

 

b) to seek tenants to occupy space that will be created in the West wing of the building;

 

c)  to delegate authority to the Deputy Chief Executive to agree lease arrangements in consultation with the Interim Head of Legal Services and the Deputy Leader and Cabinet Member for Finance.

 

d) allocate funding of up to £975,000 from the Recovery Investment Strategy budget in the Capital Programme to facilitate the changes to the Trinity Road offices and fund structure repairs identified in the building condition survey;

 

e) The detailed costs to be agreed by the Chief Executive in consultation with the Deputy Chief Executive and the Deputy Leader and Cabinet Member for Finance.

 

f) To note that the gross revenue savings of £202,000 will contribute towards the savings from the Recovery Investment Strategy.

 

 

Additional documents:

Minutes:

The Deputy Leader presented a report from the Group Manager – Commissioning, which sought agreement to the changes to Cotswold District Council’s Offices at Trinity Road, Cirencester to facilitate implementation of the Agile Working Strategy. This would reduce the Council’s occupancy by 35%, reducing costs and carbon impact of the Council’s operations and creating let-able space within the building to provide income to the Council.

 

Councillor Stowe commented that the projected return on investment from the income provided by new tenants assumed no void periods.   With the wider changes to agile working being adopted everywhere, how confident was the council that the building would remain consistently occupied? Councillor Evemy stated that officers had confirmed there was interest from organisations looking for high quality, centrally located space with good parking provision but there was always a risk.  Councillor Evemy added that the 12% projected return on investment was for full occupancy but lower occupancy (50%) would still exceed the recovery investment strategy of around 4%.

 

Councillor Cunningham commented on the 25% increase in carbon reduction costs between December and January review and details of the larger line items.  Councillor Evemy stated that the December figure did not include the contingency, but this was included in the January figure.   The Chief Accountant stated that the costs reflected solar PV, insulation, changes to lighting etc.

 

Councillor Blomefield commented on the organisations likely to be interested in sharing the building and asked if commercial lease lengths would be offered and how car parking for staff and visitors would be allocated between the two organisations.  Councillor Evemy confirmed that any agreement with new tenants would be on commercial terms and include a parking provision.

 

Councillor Andrews commented that some teams work better when located together and provision needed to be made to meet this requirement.  The Council Officer responded that there had been 3 rounds of consultation and this had reduced the final amount of space that has now been allocated for other tenants, and all Council teams are now happy with their allocation of space.

 

Councillor Theodoulou commented that shared car parking could become a problem unless the allocation of parking was clearly defined at the start of any co-location.  Councillor Theodoulou added that careful consideration should be given to the benefit gained by junior officers working alongside more experienced colleagues learning the job as they go.  The Council Officer stated that ‘learning from peers’ had been recognised as an important training method for certain services and this had been addressed throughout the consultations, and added that online training had improved significantly.  Councillor Evemy confirmed car parking will be considered as part of negotiating agreements with future tenants.   

 

Councillor Berry commented this was a large project with implications for the Council and asked if a cross party working board to work with officers to deliver successful outcome to the changes.  Councillor Evemy agreed to consider this and identify how Members can be brought into the project as it moves forward.

 

Councillor Coxcoon commented that  ...  view the full minutes text for item 76.

77.

Review of Licensing Fees pdf icon PDF 60 KB

Purpose

Licensing fees are set on a cost recovery basis. The current fees have been reviewed against the cost of delivering the service and it is proposed from 1st April 2022 that there is a 5% increase on all licence fees excluding statutory fees. The Council is required to keep fees at a level that provide a cost neutral service.

 

Recommendation(s)

To adopt the fees as set out in Annex A of this report.

Additional documents:

Minutes:

Review of Licensing Fees

 

Councillor Layton, the Cabinet Member for Development Management and Licensing presented the report that proposed a small increase to Licensing fees that would enable Licensing service continues to cover its operational costs.

 

RESOLVED: The Council agreed to adopt the fees as set out in Annex A of this report

 

Voting Record - For 28, Against: 0, Abstention: 0, Absent: 6.

78.

Appointment and Remuneration of Independent Persons pdf icon PDF 80 KB

Purpose

To appoint Independent Persons for standards matters, commence a subsequent recruitment campaign, and approve allowances payable.

 

Recommendation(s)

a) Phyllida Pyper, John Acton and Michael Paget-Wilkes are re-appointed as Independent Persons, effective from 01.04.2022.  All appointments to be a maximum of one year.

 

b) The Independent Persons are paid an annual allowance of £1000 per annum on a monthly basis, plus a mileage allowance equivalent to the rate paid to elected Members.

 

c) Authorise the Director of Governance & Development to commence a recruitment campaign prior to the expiration of current appointments and to enable reports to be presented on future appointments.

Additional documents:

Minutes:

Appointment and Remuneration of Independent Persons

 

The Leader, Councillor Harris presented a proposal to re-appoint the 3 independent persons for standards matter for a further year, and authorise the Director of Governance and Development to commence a recruitment campaign to enable future appointments to be made.  Council Members asked a number of questions about the appointment, accountability and work of the independent persons.  The Director of Governance & Development and the Leader provided responses to each of these.

 

RESOLVED: The Council agreed that PhyllidaPyper, John Acton and Michael Paget-Wilkes are re-appointed as Independent Persons, effective from 01.04.2022, all appointments to be a maximum of one year, the Independent Persons are paid an annual allowance of £1000 per annum on a monthly basis, plus a mileage allowance equivalent to the rate paid to elected Members, the Director of Governance & Development is authorised to commence a recruitment campaign prior to the expiration of current appointments and to enable reports to be presented on future appointments

 

Voting Record- For 28, Against 0, Abstention: 0, Absent: 6.

79.

Report of Decision Taken by the Chief Executive Using Urgency Powers Under the Council Constitution pdf icon PDF 219 KB

Purpose

To report a decision taken by the Chief Executive on 4 March 2022 using urgency powers to the next meeting of Council.

 

Recommendation(s)

That Council notes the decision taken by the Chief Executive using urgency powers.

Additional documents:

Minutes:

Report of Decision Taken by the Chief Executive Using Urgency Powers Under the Council Constitution

 

Councillor Tony Dale presented the report on the decision to enable the Gloucestershire Economic Growth Joint Committee to continue to support businesses to grow in a green, sustainable manner and provide high value jobs.  The Council noted the decision made by the Chief Executive.

 

RESOLVED: The Council noted the decision taken by the Chief Executive using urgency powers.

80.

Notice of Motions

In accordance with Council Procedure Rule 12, the following Motions have been received:-

 

a)   Motion – Sewage in Rivers

 

Proposed by Councillor Andrew Doherty, Seconded by Councillor Lisa Spivey

 

Council notes that

 

  1. There is great concern at reports that Thames Water, Seven Trent Water and Wessex Water discharges raw sewage into Cotswold rivers. This happened 1260 times in 2020.

  2. Statistics from the Rivers Trust shows sewage discharges across all locations in the Cotswold district in 2020 occurred for 17609 hours in total.

  3. These timings show that the discharges have become routine, rather than an emergency response to exceptional conditions.

  4. In response to a petition on such discharges, the Government has stated that ‘Tackling the harm caused by sewage is a top priority for Government’.

  5. The Government has stated that ‘Climate change has led to increased rainfall and water infrastructure has not kept pace with development growth’.

  6. In addition to having a negative impact on local wildlife and forcing a local watercress farm to cease trading, this also hugely affects the quality of life and the enjoyment of water-based activities for residents along the course of the rivers and at times causes contaminated water to be on roads and pavements, and into local properties.

 

Council believes that

 

  1. The establishment of a Storm Overflows Taskforce and a date of September 2022 from the Government to publish a plan to reduce sewage discharges from storm outflows is too little, too late to tackle the issue.

  2. The rules on sewage discharges must be tightened and enforcement improved, in conjunction with the Environment Agency.

  3. Housing developers should meet the costs of the required supply and disposal of water from new homes.

  4. The Government must make capital funding urgently available to address these issues.

  5. Solutions to these issues cannot be local, as sewage output in one geographic area affects another.

 

Council instructs

 

  1. The Leader and Chief Executive to write to the relevant Government Ministers, requesting an acceleration in the capital programme to lower risks of untreated sewage discharges into our rivers, and an assurance that local housing developers will be expected to fund water infrastructure to meet the needs of new housing.

 

  1. The Leader and Chief Executive to work with other local authorities to call on the Government to provide guidance and funding to local planning authorities to challenge water companies to deliver the urgent upgrades required to water treatment capacity.

 

??Council resolves to

 

  1. Set up a working group, with neighbouring Local Planning Authorities, that will develop appropriate policy to guide planning application determination and enforcement in those areas where sewage treatment is insufficient. Incorporating legislative frameworks and the five principles recently outlined in legislation: integration, prevention, precautionary, rectification at source, and the polluter pays principle.

 

Rivers Trust Data on Sewage Discharge in the Cotswolds - 2020

 

Where?

Times

Hours

Company

Tetbury

122

502

WW

Didmarton

96

1886

WW

Avening

90

283

STW

South Cerney

72

735

TW

Ampney

108

2316

TW

Fairford

138

2492

TW

Lechlade

51

845

TW

Andoversford

50

822

TW

Northleach

70  ...  view the full agenda text for item 80.

Additional documents:

Minutes:

Motion 1 - Sewage in Rivers

 

Councillor Doherty and Councillor Spivey presented the report and addressed the Council on the problems of Sewage in Rivers across the District area.  Several Members commented and expressed support for the motion with personal experiences of the problem they had encountered.

 

RESOLVED:  The Council instructed the Leader and Chief Executive to write to the relevant Government Ministers, requesting an acceleration in the capital programme to lower risks of untreated sewage discharges into our rivers, and an assurance that local housing developers will be expected to fund water infrastructure to meet the needs of new housing.

 

The Leader and Chief Executive were also instructed to work with other local authorities to call on the Government to provide guidance and funding to local planning authorities to challenge water companies to deliver the urgent upgrades required to water

 

It was also agreed that the Leader and Chief Executive will set up a working group, with neighbouring Local Planning Authorities, that will develop appropriate policy to guide planning application determination and enforcement in those areas where sewage treatment is insufficient. Incorporating legislative frameworks and the five principles recently outlined in legislation: integration, prevention, precautionary, rectification at source, and the polluter pays principle.

 

Voting Record - For 28, Against: 0, Abstention 0, Absent 6,

 

Motion 2 – Parliamentary Boundary Proposals

 

The Leader, Councillor Harris and Councillor Forde addressed the Council on the Boundary Commission’s proposals to create two new Parliamentary constituencies covering the Cotswold District to ensure electoral equality in numbers in the new parliamentary constituencies.  Cotswold District Council’s had initially supported the Commission’s proposals and proposed the names of the constituencies should be changed from The Cotswolds to North Cotswolds’ and from ‘Cirencester & North Wiltshire to ‘South Cotswolds’ respectively.  Baunton Parish Council had submitted a request to the Boundary Commission in the initial consultation requesting that Chedworth and Churn Valley ward be included in the proposed Cirencester and North Wiltshire seat, as residents in the villages that make up the Chedworth and Churn Valley ward look to Cirencester as their main centre for shopping, healthcare and education.  A number of Members expressed their support or opposition to the proposal

 

RESOLVED: The Council authorised the Chief Executive to submit a written response to the Boundary Commission outlining the Council’s position as set out in this motion and asks the Leader of the Council to speak at the Boundary Commission’s public hearing in Gloucester later this month in support of the Council’s position.

 

A recorded named vote was requested by Cllr Tony Berry and the Conservative Group. Cllrs Berry, Theodoulou and Andrews stood.

 

Voting Record  - For 16, Against 11, Abstention 1, Absent: 6.

 

For: Cllrs Bloomer, Coleman, Coxcoon, Dale, Doherty, Evemy, Forde, Harris (Joe), Harris (Mark), Hughes (Roly), Ind, Layton, Maunder, Robbins, Selwyn, Spivey (16)

 

Against: Cllrs Andrews, Berry, Blomefield, Cunningham, Hirst, Jepson, Judd, Norris, Stowe, Theodoulou, Trotter (11)

 

Abstain: Hughes (Robin) (1)

 

Motion 3  ...  view the full minutes text for item 80.

81.

Next meeting

25 May 2022 – 2pm

Additional documents:

Minutes:

 

 

Next Meeting 25th May 2022 2.00pm