Issue - meetings
Officer Overview of the Report
Meeting: 30/06/2026 - Deputy Leader and Cabinet Member for Housing and Planning Decision Meeting (Item 3.)
3. Officer Overview of the Report
PDF 642 KB
Officer to provide a brief verbal summary of the report with key details relating to the decision, providing any updates that need to be considered by the Cabinet Member when taking the decision.
To agree CDC responses to Neighbourhood Plan consultations for
Moreton (Reg. 16), Cirencester (Reg. 16) and Chipping Campden (Reg. 16).
Additional documents:
- Annex A - Moreton Reg 16 Consultation CDC Comments, item 3.
PDF 165 KB
- Annex B - Moreton NP Reg 16 Plan Document, item 3.
PDF 30 MB
- Annex C - Moreton NP Basic Conditions Statement, item 3.
PDF 823 KB
- Annex D - Moreton Consultation Statement, item 3.
PDF 1 MB
- Annex E - Moreton Equalities Impact Assessment, item 3.
PDF 552 KB
- Annex F - Moreton HRA Screening, item 3.
PDF 4 MB
- Annex G - Moreton SEA Screening, item 3.
PDF 578 KB
- Annex H - Moreton Reg 16 Consultation Reps, item 3.
PDF 20 MB
- Annex I - Cirencester Reg 16 Consultation CDC Comments V2., item 3.
PDF 158 KB
- Annex J - Cirencester NP Reg 16, item 3.
PDF 42 MB
- Annex K - Cirencester NP Basic Conditions Statement, item 3.
PDF 18 MB
- Annex L - Cirencester NP Consultation Statement, item 3.
PDF 40 MB
- Annex M - Cirencester NP HRA Screening, item 3.
PDF 2 MB
- Annex N - Cirencester NP SEA Screening, item 3.
PDF 3 MB
- Annex O - Cirencester Reg 16 Consultation Reps, item 3.
PDF 21 MB
- Annex P - Chipping Campden NP Reg 16 Plan Document, item 3.
PDF 8 MB
- Annex Q - Chipping Campden NP - Examiner's Fact Check Report, item 3.
PDF 438 KB
- Annex R - Chipping Campden NP Examiner's Final Report (1), item 3.
PDF 438 KB
- Webcast for Officer Overview of the Report
Decision:
Moreton-in-Marsh Neighbourhood Plan (Regulation 16)
The Senior Local & Neighbourhood Planning Policy Officer introduced the report and explained:
· The plan had been formally submitted with Annex B (plan document) and Annexes C–H (supporting evidence).
· A Regulation 16 consultation had been undertaken over six weeks, involving statutory consultees, residents, and internal planning officers.
· The Council’s response was set out in Annex A.
He also confirmed that the plan contained 20 policies which had been developed over several years with significant community input.
It was noted that the Council was broadly supportive of the plan’s vision and policy framework. Most comments were minor drafting amendments aimed at:
· improving clarity of policy wording,
· avoiding duplication across policies,
· ensuring consistency with development management interpretation.
It was noted that the only substantive point of divergence related to Policy 15 (Local Green Space Site 5). Officers considered the site might not fully meet national criteria for designation. However, the parish had retained the designation despite earlier Reg. 14 comments. It was noted that this matter would be tested through independent examination.
It was further noted that following receiptof therecommendations, thenext steps would be for anotherCabinet Member Decision Meeting to decide on the following:
· Reg18: Publicationof theExamination Reportand CDCDecision Statement;
· Arrange aReferendum forMoreton parishto voteon adoptingthe Neighbourhood Plan;
· Making (oradoption) ofthe Planif amajority (>50%)support itsadoption (this decision could be deferred to a later meeting).
Cirencester
The Senior Local & Neighbourhood Planning Policy Officer introduced the report and explained:
· That the plan submission included Annex J (main plan) and Annexes
K–O (supporting material).
· A Regulation 16 consultation had been completed.
· It was noted that the Council’s response was set out in Annex I.
He noted that colleagues, statutory bodies and landowners had all been consulted on and that the comments had been taken into account in Annex I the CDC response. It was note that there had been some initial delays due to the absence of a policies map, which had since been resolved.
It was further noted that once a Neighbourhood Plan was adopted it would be taken into account as part of the assessment of planning applications in the area it covered. The aim of the input and CDC’s comments was to ensure that the policies were effective. A key theme was ensuring that policies were clearly worded for decision-making, capable of being applied consistently in planning applications, and aligned with both the adopted and emerging Local Plan.
Chipping Campden
The Senior Local & Neighbourhood Planning Policy Officer introduced the report and explained that the examination of that particular Neighbourhood Plan had been completed and reported that the examination had included a public hearing with landowners and town council participation, held at the Independent Examiners request, to try to come to an agreement regarding Local Green Space designations.
The complexity of Local Green Space designation and relationship with land ownership and management (including Tree Preservation Orders) was discussed. ... view the full decision text for item 3.